Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Get it straight - Strickland massively increased state government

From The Daily Briefing:
Strickland has said the $5 billion in stimulus money the state used in the budget helped prevent deep cuts in funding for education, Medicaid and other services.
That's an interesting way to phrase how the stimulus dollars were used, especially when you consider over the next two years overall state spending is expanding by nearly 8%.

If the dollars simply prevented deep cuts, then why did Strickland have to expand state government at such a high rate?

My Man Mitch.

On Monday, a microstorm of news broke about IN Governor Mitch Daniels admitting an openness to running for President in 2012. Seeing as he had previously sworn off any interest, despite the buzz he creates in conservative circles, this was a seemingly big deal.

A loyal reader wrote to me this afternoon to ask me my thoughts on Daniels' strategic decision to express interest now. This was my response.
Believe it or not, Daniels is already way behind when it comes to '12 prep.

Folks like Pawlenty and Romney have already secured a good chunk of the finite number of top tier talent necessary to coordinate a Presidential election, and they are doing so far more transparently than Daniels.

Stating his intentions so publicly at least provides him a stage to increase his profile in the national media and enable him to establish positions that he has otherwise avoided(like foreign policy - I love Mitch, but I need to hear what he has to say on national security).

The timing was right for Daniels to make the move.
For those interested in learning more about Mitch's amazing success and resume, I highly recommend reading this article that appeared in the National Review last June. If you aren't already a fan, you will be.

If you've been paying attention to 3BP, I've been mentioning him as a possible contender since back in October. In two polls of 3BP's readership, he finished 2nd among all contenders back in October and 1st among the Pawlenty, Giuliani, Thune, Barbour, Daniels group in November.

I'm not necessarily endorsing him, but I'm very happy to see such a seemingly solid candidate considering running for the highest office in the land.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Breaking It Down - The 2/23 Quinnipiac Ohio Gubernatorial Poll

Let's get the least well liked number out of the way first. In the latest Quinnipiac Poll of registered Ohio voters, Gov. Ted Strickland leads John Kasich 44-39.

And at the end of the day, what the topline reads is what matters.

But this isn't the end of the day.

In fact, we're 252 days from the end of the day.

So what is most informative is how the electorate is positioned for 11.2.10. And that is virtually all good news for John Kasich.

So let's get to it...

Name ID
This is John Kasich's biggest challenge. According to Quinnipiac, 62% of Ohioans don't know enough about John Kasich to have an opinion. While this has improved from the 69% in the last Q poll in November, it still highlights the most important distinction between Quinnipiac and Rasmussen - who they are polling.

Rasmussen's polling focuses only on Likely Voters. Quinnipiac focuses on Registered Voters.

So while 62% of Q's voters don't have an opinion of Kasich, that number goes all the way down to 22% in Rasmussen - thus, the 11 point swing between polls.

But among the voters who do have an opinion, what has happened to Kasich's approval rating since the last Q poll in November? With the left wing assault on Kasich, you'd expect his disapproval numbers to have exponentially risen.

They haven't. Kasich's approval to disapproval ratio still stands at 2.5 to 1. Among Independents, his approval numbers have increased more than his disapproval numbers.

The Issues
This is the big one. With all re-election campaigns being first and foremost a referendum on the incumbent, these questions help shape how Ohioans will vote come November.

Quinnipiac asked:
In general, how satisfied are you with the way things are going in Ohio today?
Do you think that Ted Strickland has kept his campaign promises so far or not?
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Ted Strickland is handling the economy?
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Ted Strickland is handling the state budget?


On every single question, dissatisfaction and disapproval of Governor Strickland worsened from the last Quinnipiac poll last November.

And on the number one issue on everyone's mind, who would do a better job rebuilding Ohio's economy - Ted Strickland or John Kasich - Kasich is up 6.

Who would do a better job managing Ohio's budget? Kasich is also up 6. In conjunction with Rasmussen, this is the second poll in a row that confirms the Democrat attack vs. Kasich on taxes/budget issues doesn't resonate.

Obama
With 52% of Ohioans disapproving of the President, 57% disapproving of his job on the economy, and 58% disapproving of his job on health care, one thing is clear - Obama isn't going to be helping Ted anytime soon.

Summary
One frustration I have with Quinnipiac is that there is no way to measure voter enthusiasm. For example, a candidate's "strong approval" is far different from "approval" in general. Rasmussen and the Ohio news poll highlighted an enthusiasm gap with Strickland that we don't have see measured in Quinnipiac. Voter enthusiasm = GOTV, and all signs from other polls indicate it being a major challenge for Strickland in November.

But with all these numbers siding towards Kasich, why do registered voters still prefer Ted Strickland? Simple. If voters don't know the incumbent's opponent, they feel less comfortable voicing their support. Need evidence? Look at the Rasmussen numbers that consistently show Kasich ahead in a sample that includes voters that actually know who he is.

It's also clear that the massive Democrat efforts to define Kasich first have so far failed. Additionally, Strickland and the ODP have failed at improving Strickland's reputation as a manager of Ohio's economy and its budget.

Expectedly, Kasich still has a long way to go. In order to take advantage of Ohio's nasty feelings towards its Governor, Kasich needs to improve his name ID and define himself as the viable alternative. The question then becomes, when should Kasich start spending the gobs of money necessary to communicate that message? I'm not so sure 252 days out from election day is the smartest way to spend those dollars.

Ultimately, there is little evidence that the one thing that can help Strickland's chances, a substantively improved economy, will happen over the next few months. But what can change is voter understanding of John Kasich, his record, and what he can do for Ohio.

And how that pans out will determine who wins on 11.2.10.

Meet John.

Great new vid from the Kasich guys...

Haley Barbour is a force.

One year ago when discussing the importance of winning the New Jersey/Virginia gubernatorial races I said the following:
[Winning] will inspire the RNC and State Parties nationwide to push harder and faster for quality congressional candidates and the money necessary to win those states.
Well, an example of this prognostication came in an article from yesterday's Politico:
The Republican Governors Association announced it raked in a record-shattering $13.5 million in pledges in conjunction with its annual gala in Washington Monday.

“Republicans saw the difference the RGA made in Virginia and New Jersey last year and are ready to replicate those efforts nationwide this year,” said RGA Gala chairman and Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-Va.) in a statement.
At the end of 2009, the RGA already had $25 million in the bank - a full 30% more than their Democrat rivals at the DGA.

And now we learn about another record-breaking haul.

One thing is clear - RGA Chairman and MS Gov. Haley Barbour is a beast.

By dominating the money race he is putting GOP candidates in a fantastic position to dominate gubernatorial races in the Fall. If that happens, the political capital Barbour will wield will be hard to contain.

In other words, he's running away with the MVP award.

That's not a bad position to be in for someone who is considering running for President.

Strickland prepares to go Back to the Future

In a discussion with NBC's Chuck Todd, Gov. Ted Strickland was asked about the health care debate and his experience losing his seat in Congress in 1994.

The money quote:
"...the American people do not reward failure."
With that in mind, consider this:
  • Ohio has lost 184,900 jobs over the last 12 months.
  • Ohio has lost 339,900 jobs since Ted Strickland became Governor.
  • Ohio has lost 399,200 jobs since the last national recession ended in November of 2001. Twenty-three states lost jobs during this period, and only Michigan fared worse than Ohio.

The House will flip.

At least if things keep up as they have been.

Just ask Charlie Cook.

The money quote:
I've spent the last couple of days talking to some of the brightest Democrats in the party that are not in the White House. And it's very hard to come up with a scenario where Democrats don't lose the House. It's very hard. Are the seats there right this second? No. But we're on a trajectory on the House turning over...

One other note on those Presidential Approval numbers...

Remember, when the President went to New Jersey and Massachusetts to rally the troops for victory over Chris Christie and Scott Brown, he had 38% and 37% "strong approval" support. Those voicing "strong approval" were the exact folks Obama needed to inspire to get to the polls.

And yet, he didn't sway the numbers one smidgen.

Yeah, I said 'smidgen'.

What are his national "strong approval" numbers now?

22%.

In other words, support among the faithful has dropped by 42%, and that makes it extremely difficult for the President be considered anything but a liability for Democrats hoping for a victory in November.

If you fail - fail, fail once again.

It's been 244 days since the primetime ABC Obamacare Infomercial aired.

Yesterday, the President finally unveiled his own plan.

Quietly. Posting it on the White House site. Without an event. Without any fanfare. Without an infomercial.

Why?


Most amusingly, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, with a Director appointed by Speaker Pelosi, said the President's plan lacked enough details to even be scored appropriately.

But ultimately, the question is whether this latest incarnation has any chance of passing.

Well, Megan McArdle has a solid post detailing the possibilities. Check it out.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Massive Recruitment Fail by Ohio Dems

Jim Geraghty had an interesting observation this morning:
According to GreenPapers.com, no Democrat filed against half of the Republicans currently representing Ohio in the House: Mike Turner in the Third District, Jim Jordan in the Fourth District, Bob Latta in the Fifth District, and Steve Austria in the Seventh District.

Nine of the ten House Democrats from Ohio will face a Republican opponent, except for Marcia Fudge in the Eleventh District.

UPDATE: In 2008, Obama carried Fudge's district with 85 percent of the vote; it's rated an astounding D+32 in the Cook Partisan Voting Index.

By contrast, the four uncontested GOP-held districts are ones where the incumbent will have an advantage, but not an overwhelming one: McCain carried Turner's district with only 52 percent of the vote and it's rated only R+5 in the Cook Partisan Voting Index. McCain's vote in the other three: 60 percent in Jordan's, 53 percent in Latta's, 54 percent in Austria's. They're rated R+15, R+9, and R+7, respectively.

This means far more than just making it easy on these four Republicans.

Jim Jordan has $743,000 cash-on-hand.
Michael Turner has $274,000 cash-on-hand.
Steve Austria has $260,000 cash-on-hand.
Bob Latta has $176,000 cash-on-hand.

That's nearly $1.5 million that won't need to be spent defending their own district.

Or if you look at it another way, it's a good chunk of change that can enhance their own profile within the caucus by contributing large amounts to campaign committees and candidates to help other GOPers win.

So, with that said, I think we all owe ODP Chairman Chris Redfern and the DCCC a great, big thank you for doing their part to make our victory that much easier come November.

Yeah, that's about right.

Swing and a miss.

From this morning's PD:

For years, no one has cared about that deal. But now that Kasich is running for Ohio governor, his 1996 purchase of land northeast of Columbus has left Ohio bloggers speculating that Kasich got a steal.

He paid a fraction of the price of neighboring parcels for a home site on 10 acres that backed up to a heron rookery, and was adjacent to a golf course. The county initially thought the land was worth $172,500. Kasich insisted it was only worth what he paid: $105,000.

Yet public records examined by The Plain Dealer suggest the story of Kasich's land deal is nuanced and complex. It appears Kasich got a good price, but anything else may be conjecture.

So Strickland's dirt digging "consultant" Sandy Theis throws some dirt on the wall - Lefty bloggers pick it up - And ta daaaa. Story!

Read the rest. Good stuff.

Now here's hoping the Plain Dealer will play fair and start looking deeper into the messes made by Jello Ted and his political cronies.

Mandel Wows CPAC

Some of you likely watched or read about the proceedings at CPAC this past week.

What you may have missed was a fantastic opportunity by Ohio Treasurer candidate Josh Mandel to speak to the thousands of GOP activists from the podium. And he knocked it out of the park.

Take a look for yourself.



A couple of other brief notes about my time at CPAC...

First off, it was great to chat with some old friends, make some new ones, and see face to face the many folks I've only gotten to know by e-mail/gchat over the past year. All are good people and are in this business for the right reasons. Keep up the great work.

Also, don't pay one lick of attention to the results of the straw poll. The only people giving it any attention are Paulnuts and the media. Only a very small fraction of attendees made the effort to vote, and it IS a straw poll, so we all can figure how much that poll is worth.

Finally, this guy is an idiot.

The Boys in Blue are miffed at The Guy Hiding Under His Desk.

From yesterday's Columbus Dispatch:
Former State Highway Patrol superintendents say the agency's reputation for independent, nonpolitical law enforcement is being tarnished by interference from political appointees.

[...]

Secrecy surrounding the selection of a new superintendent, failure to investigate a case of "obvious fraud" by a state contractor and the scuttling of a planned sting at the Governor's Residence prompted the ex-colonels to go public with their concerns.

[...]

"I can assure you there has been no political interference in these matters from this office," Strickland said.

The former No. 1 and No. 2 patrol leaders trace problems to Strickland's 2007 appointment of Guzman and the team he assembled.

"All of a sudden, we needed to be fixed. It was a daily thing. It is a daily thing," said William Costas, who retired last month as a lieutenant colonel.
Shocked? I didn't think so.

The "lack of institutional control" that I discussed last week seems to be more and more evident. Now, with these former high-ranking officials speaking up, it's safe to say Strickland's leadership gap has continued to widen.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Tiberi keeps moving the 12th off the Dem radar

In addition to adding two new Democrats to his list of competitive congressional districts, this week Charlie Cook also moved Pat Tiberi's race from "Lean R" to "Likely R".
"...in outraising his challenger $1.1 million to $392,000 last year, Tiberi proved that he is one of the hardest-working incumbents in the country and won't be caught asleep at the wheel. Brooks's predicament is further complicated by the fact that she doesn't live in the district, has a record in elected office to defend, and is running in a very Republican year when popular former Rep. John Kasich will be on the gubernatorial ballot and turnout in Columbus's heavily African-American precincts is likely to drop significantly."
We could have told him that months ago. Oh wait, we sorta did. Last August. But better.
Now remember, Brooks' only name recognition in the 12th district is within Franklin County. Since 2000, Tiberi has consistently far outpaced opponents in Licking and Delaware Counties. That means Brooks not only is going to need to outpace how Democrats did in Franklin County in 2008, when Dem turnout was through the roof for Obama, but she is going to need to raise vast amounts of money to create any semblance of a challenge in Licking and Delaware County.
Now, we can finally say that while Brooks doesn't live in the district, she has finally decided to define her campaign HQ as IN the 12th district. Sorta.

The campaign address she listed in her latest FEC report was 222 East 11th Avenue in Columbus....literally one half block from the 15th district in which she actually resides.

In fact, here is a picture of her campaign hq via google maps.


Can you say 'sketchy'? It sorta has a Sopranos meets an abandoned church kinda feel.

But, at the end of the day, props have to go out to Tiberi who has clearly worked his butt off to make sure this district that went for Obama just over a year and a half ago is so far off the radar that the DCCC won't even want to waste their time with it.

No wonder Paula Brooks never picked out a realtor.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Winning the Stimulus debate - Dems have a massive hill to climb

Upon the anniversary of the Stimulus this week, Democrats have gone on the offensive in an effort to improve the horrible reputation of the Stimulus among the voting public.

How bad?

Well, a CBS/NYT(!!!) poll from last week showed only SIX PERCENT of Americans believing the Stimulus had created jobs. For reference, that's one percent less than the number of Americans who still believed Elvis was alive a few years ago.

But that isn't stopping Speaker Pelosi from latching her wagon to the issue.

From an article in The Hill earlier this week:


Obviously, this has me smiling.

As I've been saying since very early spring last year, the Stimulus has the potential to be a huge winning issue come November. Why? Because of the reality of the situation. When voters, or their families or neighbors don't have jobs, they have a real life scenario showing them that the Stimulus didn't do what was promised.

That makes emphasizing its failures a very easy lift for Republicans. It's easy to communicate to the American public.

The Democrats promised you jobs. Where are they?

That's easy to communicate in a 30-second spot in the Fall.

But, it's even more effective in this longer youtube video produced by House Minority Whip Eric Cantor.



Thanks, Nancy.

Dum Dum Dummmmmm!

'Nuff said.

Where in Ohio is Yvette McGee Brown? - THE MUSIC VIDEO!!!

A friend sent this to me saying he was inspired by this post of mine from earlier this week.

And I can't stop laughing.

(be patient on this one)



And it should be noted, that despite my honest inquiry about McGee Brown's whereabouts, not one of the many Democrats that read this site provided any information.

Interesting.

Things get worse for Ohio's congressional Democrats...

Just 11 days ago, political prognosticator Charlie Cook had four Ohio Democrats on his list of vulnerable congressional seats.

And now, thanks to Bill Johnson and Tom Ganley, that number has increased by 50%.

As of the February 18th rankings, Reps. Charlie Wilson and Betty Sutton have a new target on their heads.

As we've discussed before, Wilson is facing a tough challenge in a district that has voted for George Bush and John McCain in the past two Presidential elections. Bill Johnson's record of service to his country and as an entrepreneur makes him the perfect candidate to provide a solid challenge.

Meanwhile, in the 13th district, Ganley brings a massive cash advantage against Sutton in a race where internal GOP polls have already shown Ganley with an edge.

With the latest generic congressional ballot from Rasmussen showing Republicans increasing their lead to 9 points, it's no wonder Ohio Republicans have been able to recruit such solid candidates. The political environment couldn't be much better.

And that shows in Larry Sabato's most recent "Crystal Ball" prediction. While the longtime political analyst only sees the GOP gaining 27 seats in the House, two of them are courtesy two Democrats from Ohio.

Mary Jo Kilroy and Steve Driehaus.

The question now becomes, when will the DCCC give up on these two races and focus their resources on defending the other four vulnerable Ohio Democrats?

Romney turns the 'Party of No' on its head.

Yesterday's reception of Mitt Romney at CPAC was pretty impressive.

Clearly, he's worked hard to develop a solid following among the activist base.

But, I'm still not a fan.

He's a retread. He fails to connect with primary voters(far different than Party activists). He has a record of flip flopping on vital issues. And then there is that whole Romneycare business.

That doesn't mean I wouldn't support him if he were the nominee, but it would be with about the same enthusiasm I had for John McCain.

Meh.

With all that said, Romney's speech included a theme that I hope Republicans take up across the nation in response to Democrats labeling the GOP as the Party of No.
And he turned the "Party of No" argument back on Dems, asking why they say "no" to things like a balanced budget, entitlement reform, tax cuts and prosecuting Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a military tribunal.

"We conservatives don't have a corner on saying 'No,'" Romney said. "We're just the ones who say it when that's the right thing to do."
On its face, it's a very simple retort, but not one we've really heard yet from Republicans. But it's effective because it refocuses the Dem talking point back on them - the Party in power.

My compliments to his well-paid staff who came up with it.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Ganley's Big Move - What it means in Ohio & the Nation

Where did you hear it first?

Yours truly.


But what does it mean for the big races in Ohio, and the nation?

Believe it or not, Ganley's move has caused a bit of a ripple effect across the political landscape.

The best way to look at this is to determine the winners and losers of the decision...

WINNERS

Rob Portman - Obviously, being able to avoid a potentially costly primary is a huge win for Portman. While he almost assuredly would have won against Ganley, it's quite possible he would have needed to spend much of his $6 million to ensure his victory.

John Boehner - The House Minority Leader not only clears the primary field, but gets another potential vote for Speaker if Ganley wins.

The Tea Party - Ganley had garnered a bit of support among the Tea Partiers across the state. They now have a chance to have their own candidate get full Party backing in what is sure to be a high profile race. The question is whether Ganley tries to distance himself at all from the Tea Party movement considering the political demographics of the 13th District.

LOSERS

Lee Fisher and Jennifer Brunner - Portman gets to keep all his cash and wait to spend it against Fisher or Brunner(yeah, right) as they emerge broke and damaged from the Democrat primary. This is the last thing either of the Democrats wanted to hear.

Betty Sutton - Duh. Obviously, Rep. Sutton wasn't expecting this or else she would have more than $200k cash on hand for her re-elect. Now, right off the bat she has only 1/6 the cash of Ganley, and Ganley has every motivation to drop more into the race.

DCCC - Sutton will need help. And lots of it. This means the DCCC will be forced to defend a seat they never thought they would ever have to in 2010. And that means a lot of cash that won't go to other targeted races.

Race analysis:

This is going to be an interesting one. Yes, Sutton has garnered over 60% in both of her races in 2006 and 2008, but there was a report of an internal GOP poll showing Ganley UP by 3% that was the final driver in pushing him into the race. If true, that says a lot about Ohio's political environment.

We also have the interesting scenario of a millionaire auto-dealer going up against the creator of cash-for-clunkers. While this won't be a primary theme of the race, it will be interesting to watch how it plays out.

Ultimately, this is going to be a costly race for both candidates. And that's bad news for the Democrats. Even if Sutton does win, it will pull resources, both financially and in manpower, that could have gone elsewhere.

Somewhere, Mary Jo Kilroy, Steve Driehaus, Zack Space, and Charlie Wilson are kicking something.

Democrats are trying too hard.

One of the recent criticisms of Republicans of late has been of Congressmen who voted against the Stimulus going back to their districts and working to ensure their constituents get the funds obligated them.

Democrats call it hypocrisy.

Smart people laugh at that claim.

Like Greg Mankiw, professor of Economics at Harvard University:
Let me offer an analogy. Many Democratic congressmen opposed the Bush tax cuts. That was based, I presume, on their honest assessment of the policy. But once these tax cuts were passed, I bet these congressmen paid lower taxes. I bet they did not offer to hand the Treasury the extra taxes they would have owed at the previous tax rates. Would it make sense for the GOP to suggest that these Democrats were disingenuous or hypocritical? I don't think so. Many times, we as individuals benefit from policies we opposed. There is nothing wrong about that.

Moving the goalposts on the stimulus...

This was the headline in the papers on the anniversary of the stimulus yesterday:


What a load of crap.

Take a look at the President's speech on the day he signed the stimulus bill one year ago.

Here's a sample that nails what he believed would be the result of the legislation:
Now, what makes this recovery plan so important is not just that it will create or save 3.5 million jobs over the next two years, including 60,000-plus here in Colorado. It's that we're putting Americans to work doing the work that America needs done –- (applause) -- in critical areas that have been neglected for too long; work that will bring real and lasting change for generations to come.
Read the rest of the speech. See anything that talks about how the stimulus will head off a depression? Didn't think so.

Megan McArdle, a brilliant writer for the Atlantic(and a supporter of the stimulus!) even calls Obama out on this outlandish claim from yesterday:
So the main reason we didn't have the Great Depression is that the Treasury intervened to prop up financial institutions, while the Federal reserve pumped money into the economy with a firehose. Special guest star credits go to the FDIC, which prevented the bank runs that crippled so much of our economy in the early 1930s. If you want to credit a government program, credit TARP, not ARRA.

Did the stimulus help? Sure. But Recovery.gov currently has a nifty graphic showing that of ARRA's $787 billion in budget authority, the government has currently disbursed about $287 billion. You'd have to posit some really remarkable multipliers for the stimulus to think that this prevented us from sliding into the Great Depression.

For comparison's sake, in 1930, GDP fell by 8.6% in real terms. In 2009, the BEA says that it fell about 2.4%, or about $300 billion. Had it fallen by anything close to 8%, that would have meant a decline of roughly a trillion dollars.

So the administration is claiming that by spending less than $300 billion, it managed to prevent more than $700 billion in economic decline--in other words, that the multiplier for their spending was higher than two. They're saying that every dollar they spent increased GDP by more than $2.
There is plenty more in her article that details more about the point on multipliers. Check it out.

Emphysema of the soul.

WCPO's I-Team has an interesting investigative story about the $10 billion Ohio was awarded in 1998 via its settlement with tobacco companies.

As we all know by now, these dollars were initially designated to be used solely for anti-smoking programs, but Ohio's elected leadership since 1998, both Republican and Democrat, has seen fit to spend it on expanding state government.

Governor Strickland is the most recent guilty party in pushing to use these funds in ways besides their initial purpose. He claims the last 2.5% of the original award should be used for items such adult dental care and expanded health care for kids.

Of course, this is the usual trick we see from elected leaders - saying they need these funds for politically popular programs, and bumping the monies that should have funded those same programs for other forms of government expansion.

Remember, in the most recent budget overall state spending increases by an astounding 7.9%.

Don't be fooled, Ohio.

88.

Yesterday, John Kasich filed his paperwork to officially run for Governor with 2,797 signatures from all 88 counties in Ohio.

All 88 counties.

For those that have ever been involved in a statewide campaign, you know what a gigantic task that really is, and it speaks volumes about the Kasich organization that they were able to send the message that this really is an 88 county effort.

Here's Kasich's latest youtube submission thanking his supporters now that he has officially filed.

Governor's mansion imitates USC football...

For those that have missed this mindboggingly strange story, the Governor's mansion has become a den of sorts for drug trafficking.

WBNS investigated the story a bit deeper and filed this story yesterday.



(apologies for the formatting issues and unintended white space)

If nothing else, this story screams that phrase those familiar with NCAA sports are probably familiar with - lack of institutional control.

In college sports, "institutional control comes down to what rules exist, who was making sure those rules weren’t being broken, and whether the persons in charge of monitoring those rules were doing their jobs. Whether a member school demonstrated a lack of institutional control can vary depending on the scope of failures which led to a violation, the types of rules violated, and the depth of knowledge and reaction of those in control at a member school."

Is it breaking the law? No, it doesn't seem to be, but this situation highlights a seemingly lack of institutional control within the Governor's mansion that should have Ohioans questioning what's really going on within its walls, who knows what, who hid what, and why.

Here's hoping WBNS continues to follow the story as the Ohio Senate intensifies its investigation.

h/t: Right Ohio

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

More reasons why the jobs crisis isn't going anywhere...

One of yesterday's most popular posts here on 3BP was about why the Jobs Crisis currently facing Ohio and the nation isn't really going anywhere.

Well, an article featured in Bloomberg nailed that same theme once again.
The Right points to uncertainty over looming tax increases (aren’t death and taxes life’s two certainties?) and health-care mandates. The Left says the problem is banks aren’t lending.

The truth is a bit of both and something more basic. Small-business owners list “poor sales” as the numero uno problem. And the jobs tax credit for hiring new workers, proposed by President Obama and embraced by Congress, won’t do much to help. Employers aren’t about to pay a new worker $40,000 to earn a $5,000 credit unless that worker generates $35,000 of revenue, Dunkelberg explains. That’s Econ 101 (see “marginal revenue product” or “profit maximization”), a course most of our elected representatives seem to have missed.

The tax credit for hiring “has absolutely no impact on our decision-making,” says Phil Kenny, president of Trucks Unique, an Albuquerque, New Mexico, company that customizes pick-up trucks for commercial and individual purposes. “We have no tax liability to take a credit against.”

And that’s not all. A tax credit “is not going to make me hire when we don’t have work,” says Jim Henderson, president of Dynamic Sales Co., a 44-year-old construction and industrial supply company in St. Louis with seven employees. “I plan to sell my way out of recession, not wait for Washington to help me out.”
Our political leadership, both at the state and national level, are playing politics with the nation's economy by proposing policy initiatives that wither under scrutiny, but resound with the common public.

America needs principled leadership, not opportunistic cowards.

With nothing else left in their utility belt, Democrats latch onto the President...

An article in yesterday's Politico highlighted how President Obama will be adjusting his schedule in 2010 to lend a bigger hand to Democrats as they attempt to go against the political environment and bring home a victory on election day.
White House aides have said recently that the president will spend more time on the road, part of an effort to position him above the Washington fray and perhaps a signal that he intends to play a bigger role in helping candidates from his party who are facing tough contests.
Since then, the President's national Strong Approval ratings have sunk even lower - averaging out at around 25% since early February.

What's the big deal about Strong Approval? Well, in a nationalized election, as the Democrats seem to be playing it, those who strongly approve of the President are most likely to go out and vote for him/Democrats.

Now consider that the President's strong approval rating at the time of his visit in New Jersey, a strongly blue state, was 13 points higher than it is now in national polling, and 12 points higher in Taxachusetts.

To put it simply, if sending Obama didn't work in New Jersey and Massachusetts, it definitely won't work most anywhere else.

About that global warming business.

As my friends back in SnOwHIO recover from their most recent blizzard and as I wait for our 24" dusting from last week to melt so I can finally walk my fiancee's pug without her needing scuba gear to go out, all we can do is scoff at the global warming alarmists on the left.

Despite what we see before our eyes, AlGoreists shout over our questions again and again that the science is settled.

Well, one of the sources of their science is finally speaking up.
Phil Jones is the director of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, a key “consensus” institution that has recently been caught up in an e-mail scandal revealing a mindset of global-warming advocacy rather than dispassionate inquiry. Asked by the BBC what it means when scientists say “the debate on climate change is over,” the keeper of the flame sounded chastened. “I don’t believe the vast majority of climate scientists think this,” Jones said. “This is not my view. There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the . . . past as well.”

Jones discussed the highly contentious “medieval warming period.” If global temperatures were warmer than today back in 800–1300 A.D. — about a thousand years before Henry Ford’s assembly lines began spitting out automobiles — it suggests that natural factors have a large hand in climate change, a concession that climate alarmists are loath to make. Jones said we don’t know if the warming in this period was global in extent since paleoclimatic records are sketchy. If it was, and if temperatures were higher than now, “then obviously the late-20th-century warmth would not be unprecedented.”

Jones also noted that there hasn’t been statistically significant warming since 1995, although the cooling since 2002 hasn’t been statistically significant either.
No, environuts, the science isn't settled, and that comes from one of your own demi-gods.

Now can we start focusing on the real problems facing our planet?

Ted Strickland and Chris Redfern keep finding ways to lose.

In 2006, Cuyahoga County and it's directly adjacent counties accounted for 28% of the votes Ted Strickland needed to win the Ohio Governor's race.

In other words, it's the Democratic base of Ohio.

Now take this into account:
When political hopefuls declare their candidacies this week for November's statewide elections, it will mark the first time in at least 70 years that a Democrat from Northeast Ohio will not be seeking an executive office.
Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern quickly dismisses the observation by saying, "the reliance on having a Northeast Ohio candidate in a statewide race, from a regional standpoint, has become less important. That's not to suggest Northeast Ohio isn't important. Obviously it is, but it is as important now as central Ohio or other parts of the state."

Wrong.

As we all know, if you can't get out the vote, you're not going to win. This is exponentially more important when considering your base.

How do you get out the vote? Well from a geographical standpoint, it's vital to have longstanding relationships that provide a groundswell of grassroots support.

Well, the statewide candidates on the Democratic slate don't have any of those relationships in their geographic base. And it's showing.

Nationally known Democratic strategist Jerry Austin of Cleveland said this ticket will prove what elected officials in Northeast Ohio had suspected all along from the Strickland administration.

"Politicians up here have expressed frustration about the lack of attention from this administration for a while," Austin said. "And now you turn around and there is no one on the ballot from Cuyahoga County. Well, now people think there is absolutely a disregard for Northeast Ohio going on."

Does that sound like someone who is going to work his tail off to utilize all of his contacts to get his favorite Democrats elected to office?

What about Democratic State Senator Nina Turner?
"If anyone thinks they can disregard Cuyahoga County, then they are sadly mistaken," Turner said. She added that "people are talking about this everywhere, young and old, average citizens to bigwigs."
The vitally important Democratic political activists of Northeast Ohio clearly are unhappy with the Ohio Democratic Party and their slate of statewide candidates.

This kind of frustration, if it can't be turned around quick, will make it extremely difficult for Ted Strickland & Co. to get out the vote in the all-important Democratic bastion of Northeast Ohio.

And it could cost them dearly.

Joe Biden doesn't like Evan Bayh.

Today, the Vice President is releasing his report on the first year of the Federal Stimulus.

Yesterday, departing Indiana Democratic Senator said the following:
"...if I could create one job in the private sector by helping to grow a business, that would be one more than Congress has created in the last six months."
Not exactly the message the Vice President was hoping to combat as he releases his report.

I look forward to Jake Tapper asking him a question about it and watching as Biden responds with an "awww, golly".

When down, Driehaus cries foul.

A month and a half ago, Scott Rasmussen drew the ire of the left for what they claimed to be inaccurate polling.

We all know how that turned out.

Rasmussen, who was the first to proclaim that Scott Brown had a real shot to win Ted Kennedy's seat, showed how good he was by being up in the spotlight as the one pollster who called it first.

And now Ohio's own Rep. Steve Driehaus is crying foul over more poll numbers, this time by SurveyUSA, released by liberal blogger Jane Hamsher.

A big part of the problem is that Hamsher’s polls have been covered extensively in the media — not just in national outlets, including POLITICO, but also in local news outlets that are more important to a member’s local political standing.

One of them, the Cincinnati Enquirer, published the mid-January survey showing freshman Rep. Steve Driehaus trailing former GOP Rep. Steve Chabot by a steep 17-point margin.

“You’ve got to quit writing about these crazy-ass polls,” Driehaus told POLITICO. “They’re horrible.”

Congressman Driehaus, someone just called this for you.

Now an easy way to refute the poll released by SurveyUSA would be for the DCCC to release their own internal polling that, if they're right, would show a significantly different result.

But when challenged to do so, the Democrats refused.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

More on the Green Jobs Myth

Governor Strickland is investing a lot of political capital in the advancement of "green jobs" to help solve the jobs crisis.

I've previously discussed what a joke the plan was in the first place, but more information has come to light that should force Governor Strickland to abandon his strategy completely:

According to an ABC News report, though, almost $2 billion in “stimulus” funding has been spent so far on wind power, and yet 80% of that money has gone to foreign-owned companies.

“Most of the jobs are going overseas,” researcher Russ Choma told ABC. “According to our estimates, about 6,000 jobs have been created overseas, and maybe a couple hundred have been created in the U.S.”

In fact, despite receiving this windfall of “stimulus” cash, the U.S. wind manufacturing sector actually lost jobs in 2009, according to a year-end report by its professional association. Also, most of the jobs “created or saved” in America have been temporary construction positions, or “management” hires.

Awesome. Just awesome.

And the use of these very same stimulus dollars for "green jobs" in Ohio is the first priority of the Strickland Administration.

Seriously, Guv?

It's very simple - Strickland shouldn't be trying to buy jobs - the Governor should be working to make Ohio more attractive to ALL private industry in an effort to bring them, and their jobs, into the Buckeye state.

Make it happen.

Where in Ohio is Yvette McGee Brown?

No, seriously. I'm asking.

Besides her introduction as Governor Strickland's running mate and her bio, from what I can see there is no mention of her on the campaign website.

Google News stories yield no results.

A regular google search comes up empty of any substantive events or news stories since the campaign kickoff.

Meanwhile, Kasich running mate and Ohio Auditor Mary Taylor's name is mentioned in five stories just on the Kasich campaign's blog. Additionally, news stories about her can be found here, here, and here. She's also been following the Kasich strategy of energizing the GOP activists early in the campaign by going to speak to County Lincoln Day dinners.

But Yvette McGee Brown? Nothing. At least nothing that I can find. I'm sure she is working behind the scenes on the phones trying to raise dollars for the campaign. But beyond that, what else is she doing to promote her running mate's re-election?

It's an honest question. If anyone has seen anything or heard of anything that I'm missing, please feel free to leave a comment!

Ted Strickland has been in office for 1,130 days....

....and yet he still needs to send memos like this out to his ever-bumbling staff:
Gov. Ted Strickland has told his budget director and the head of the Department of Administrative Services to ensure that all future reports on efforts to reduce state spending reflect actual cuts in spending.
In other words, the Governor had to officially remind senior members of his Administration that reports discussing Issue A should actually discuss Issue A.

[facepalm]

Governor Envy, Part 337

Now up to bat to show Ohio what leadership is really like, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty:

The plan, released Monday, would erase a $1.2 billion state deficit largely through deep cuts in aid to local governments, in funding for health and human services and with an average 6 percent across-the-board cut to state agencies, likely to result in layoffs. Nearly one-third of the governor's budget fix would rely on $387 million in federal stimulus money. That money isn't yet in the bank and, if it doesn't come through, the cuts could be far deeper.

Pawlenty also proposed corporate and small-business tax cuts. The cost -- and benefit -- of those reductions wouldn't fully materialize until after he leaves office next year.

Now, while I'm not a fan of using stimulus dollars in this way, there is such a thing as compromise in American politics, and considering what he's trying to get through, I'm willing to give him a pass.

These kinds of cuts aren't easy to make. In the short-run, they seem politically impossible to pull off, but in the long-run Minnesotans will be far better off with a more efficiently run state government and a much more welcoming tax climate for businesses to come in and hire.

Pawlenty nails it with this line:
"This is a spit in the ocean compared to what should be done," Pawlenty said at a Capitol news conference announcing his proposals.
Yep. Much more does need done to fix how out-of-control state government has been run over the years. And Ohio needs John Kasich to come in to fix the problem Ted Strickland refuses to even acknowledge exists.

Ben Konop, we hardly knew ye.

Sadly, Democrat Lucas County Commissioner Ben Konop is leaving politics.
"I will not be seeking re-election in 2010," Mr. Konop, a Democrat whose four-year term expires at year's end, told The Blade in an exclusive interview.

[...]

Mr. Konop said his greatest regret as commissioner has been his inability to pass the college scholarship proposal. Critiquing his own performance, he said he regrets not building enough political coalitions to help propel his agenda. All too often, he went it alone.
In reality, I don't know much of anything about Ben Konop's political career, but his retirement does give me a chance to once again post this now famous video announcing his candidacy for office.



If you held your own in office nearly as well as you handled the heckler, then you done good, kid.

Good luck in your future endeavors.

The Jobs Crisis isn't going anywhere...

An article from the Associated Press yesterday highlighted just how deep of a mess this jobs crisis has become.

When employers hire temporary staff after a recession, it's long been seen as a sign they'll soon hire permanent workers.

Not these days.

Companies have hired more temps for four straight months. Yet they remain reluctant to make permanent hires because of doubts about the recovery's durability.

Ohio included.

Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That's what Chris DeCapua, owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus, Ohio, is hearing from clients.

DeCapua says corporate demand for temporary workers has surged. That's especially true for manufacturing-related jobs involving driving forklifts, assembling products, packing merchandise and loading it on trucks.

Yet that demand hasn't spilled over into a demand for permanent workers. And DeCapua doesn't see it turning around anytime soon.

"There is so much uncertainty, and when there is uncertainty, people and companies hold onto their checkbooks," DeCapua says.

Companies "don't want to hire permanent workers and then have to turn around and get rid of them six months later," he says.

DeCapua likely isn't alone regarding the trepidation he's hearing from clients. The unstable economy and likelihood of increased government imposed costs are stifling the economy at both the national and state level.

Fortunately, the tide is ever so slowly turning.

And a new Governor sure would help.

Monday, February 15, 2010

"Cheerleaders for Failure" fight back.

  1. Governor may come to regret his words
  2. Critics right to question train system
  3. Riding the rail - Ted Strickland rightly touts a $400 million investment. What he shouldn't dismiss are the legitimate questions
  4. Ohio will have to spend plenty to keep passenger trains running
  5. Criticism comes with job, Governor
Those headlines all come from columns in major newspaper publications across the state since Governor Strickland last week called critics of his Slow-Speed Choo Choo "Cheerleaders of Failure".

As I've mentioned before, in a political environment more strongly against wasteful or inefficient spending than has been seen in years, the Governor tying himself to the rails is a risky proposition.

And not being able to handle the criticism is a good way of getting off on the wrong foot.

Instead, the Governor should be pushing his side of the story, no matter how right we on the opposing side may be. Convince those in the middle that it's good for Ohio, and you stand a shot at at least stemming the tide of public opinion.

But Strickland's outburst only encouraged Ohio's newspapers to write once again about how risky the idea is, at best, and highlight what a horrible idea it is, at worst.

With salesmanship abilities like these, it's no wonder NCR left Ohio.

Cleaning up Athens County

Fellow blogger Jesse Hathaway is on a roll up in Athens County. Check it out:
The city auditor may have broken Ohio's nepotism law when she hired her son in 2005, according to a letter from the Delaware County Prosecutor.

Paul Hecht, son of City Auditor Kathy Hecht, earned $7,000 interning for the auditor's office during 2005, according to documents provided by Jesse Hathaway, a local Republican blogger.
The Auditor, a Democrat, is the second Dem in Athens to come under the microscope. The first, of course, was now former Dem County Chair, Susan Gwinn.

Solid work, Jesse.

Baby, Bayh Bayh Bayh.

I think I just used an NSYNC song as my headline.

I should be ashamed.

But the news that Evan Bayh has decided not to run for re-election is huge. There's no other way to put it. In fact, Charlie Cook has already moved the race from Lean Dem to Lean GOP.

It happens that quick in the world of politics.

Gotta love it.

On the Ground with Bill Johnson

A reader, JT, was kind enough to send along her perspective from the campaign kickoff announcement last week of new Ohio 6th Congressional District candidate Bill Johnson:

This past Thursday evening at the Spread Eagle Tavern Bill Johnson finished up the last leg of his campaign kickoff tour announcing his candidacy for Ohio’s 6th Congressional District. Even though Bill had already made multiple stops earlier in the day – he was chock full of energy and excitement like he was stepping up to the podium for the first time!

The Spread Eagle is one of the “must visit” campaign stops in Ohio. Dating back to the heyday of the Canal Era, this brick Federal Style building offers a backdrop of prosperous Ohio history, that helps articulate the vision and goals of candidates like Bill Johnson.

You read a lot about people being fired up lately and excited about getting involved with the political process—especially with the emergence of the Tea Party movement over the past year or so. It was exciting to see first hand people from all different walks of life coming together to support Bill and his goal to take back the 6thfor the people! He was able to fire up the crowd—especially when hitting upon the topic of Jobs. He really nailed it when he said that he would, “spend all my time worried about your job and your neighbor’s job.” Bill talked about the problems everyone is facing like unemployment and businesses falling on hard times. He talked about finding real solutions and taking action to help the people in the 6th district. The members of the crowd sure don’t believe that the way to fix the 6th is through creating a bigger government, raising our taxes and digging our nation into debt with each passing day—they weren’t shy about letting him know that! From my standpoint Bill’s message really resonated with folks who braved the snow to make the trip. To Bill’s credit he was standing right next to a roaring fireplace during the entire announcement and didn’t miss a beat—must be that good Air Force background. Didn’t seem like the audience was in a hurry to leave either, most everybody hung around and grabbed a bite to eat at the Tavern.

Bill reminded everyone that he is not another inside the DC beltway politician, but that he is an American. He wrapped up by saying that his goal is to provide the people of the 6th district a voice in Washington. This is something that has NOT happened with Charlie “Big Spender” Wilson.

The MSM Sends the Message for Kasich

Yesterday's front page of the Columbus Dispatch communicated the exact image the Kasich campaign wants to portray this campaign season.

For everyone that read the article, they came away learning one primary point...

John Kasich is an experienced and principled pragmatic problem solver.

As we all know, if your message isn't communicated quickly and efficiently in an article, you're going to lose your audience. Well, the Dispatch provided the message perfectly in the first three paragraphs:

Despite a projected $7 billion hole in Ohio's next two-year budget, Republican John Kasich assured those attending a campaign rally last month that he is up to the task of balancing it if elected governor in November.

After all, Kasich said, he had on-the-job experience in Congress as an architect of the landmark federal balanced-budget agreement of 1997.

"Not only did we balance the budget," Kasich said, "but we paid down a half-trillion dollars on the national debt -- never been done before -- and we were running a $250 billion surplus, and we had a 10-year projected surplus of $5 trillion."

Gotta love getting your key talking point front and center, eh?

Is the article all positive? Of course not. The Dispatch does a fair job of providing both viewpoints of Kasich's success in Congress as a steward of the federal budget surplus.

But one paragraph does a great job of extinguishing the argument that Kasich doesn't play well with others:

"John Kasich was a pragmatist," said Domenici, now a senior fellow at the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center. During negotiations, he said, Kasich and others "had to accept compromises to get things done. He (Kasich) did that, and he surprised a lot of people."

Now, some on the opposite side of the aisle may love reading this quote from Newt Gingrich:

"I always preferred having Kasich near me," Gingrich said, adding that Kasich "pulled the Republican conference an enormous distance in the right direction by courage and tenacity. Without him, we couldn't have gotten it done."

More likely than not, those happy with latching Kasich to Gingrich are the same people who believe aligning Kasich and Rob Portman with Bush will work, too. Well, as history has proven, attempting to push a link to someone unpopular who used to be in power is a tactic very rarely proven effective in campaigns. But, by all means Dems, keep it up.

As I mentioned in previous poll analyses, with Kasich's less than strong name ID, it's important for the candidate to define himself before the opposition does. Well, without spending a cent, the Kasich campaign got themselves a front page story detailing the exact definition they were looking for.

Thanks, CD.

Hershey minimizes Brunner

William Hershey of the Dayton Daily News is one of my favorite political writers in the state if for no other reason than he's realistic. He doesn't buy into the talking points and understands what it takes to win and lose elections.

Well, his recent article on Jennifer Brunner isn't exactly the kind of earned media her campaign was hoping for:

“You have to have resources,” Brunner said last week. “You don’t have to have the same amount of resources that consultants tell you (that) you have to have.”

Maybe, but what Brunner’s trying to pull off has little precedent in the United States or in Ohio, where the U.S. Senate candidates in 2006 spent nearly $25 million.

In other words, give it up, kid.

Later, Hershey provides a bit of a reality check to the Brunner camp's assertion that she can run a hard grassroots-based campaign similar to Paul Wellstone's win in Minnesota back in 1990.

Except Wellstone had 21 times the amount of cash as Brunner and was able to go up on TV.

Of course, we're happy Brunner is sticking to her guns and requiring Fisher to empty his bank account in order to assure victory in the Primary. So please, Jennifer, keep up the good work.

Ha.

Read the rest for a complete breakdown of how unrealistic Brunner's chances really are.

About those COEXIST bumper stickers...

I think this may be a bit more accurate to actual reality...


I dare ya to put that on your car.

UPDATE: To my surprise, I received a couple e-mails about this post - one asking where they could get one, and another claiming I was a racist. As for one, no, I don't have any idea, but see what you can find on cafepress. As for two, I must admit I'm a bit taken aback. I think it's fairly obvious to anyone with a brain in their head that all Muslims are not terrorists. With that said, that same person should know the reality of the world we live in - where a large portion of the Islamic world started a Holy War against many parts of the free world. Ultimately, the bumper sticker is satire, the kind of satire that has been seen thousands of times on comedy shows for years, and it's my hope that those who read my blog are smart enough to take it for just that.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Report: Strickland doesn't want to be Governor

On Thursday, the Governor's office went to great efforts to push the story that they had cut state spending by $366 million.

(we'll leave out the fact that total growth of the state budget expanded by 7.9%, or 4.19 billion, or 1218% of what Strickland claims to have cut)

An elaborate and detailed press release was distributed to the press that included quotes from Ohio Budget and Management Director Pari Sabrety and Department of Administrative Services Director Hugh Quill.

Now, for those that have served in state or federal government can attest, it's incredibly burdensome to get something like this through the bureaucracy and checks and double checks and triple checks for approval and eventual release to the press.

Or, at least it should be.

But after today's article in the Columbus Dispatch, it's clear that the Governor simply doesn't want to be Governor anymore. Somehow, Ted Strickland worked a report through the system in an effort to simply score points and ignore any semblance of reality.

The Dispatch's article goes out of its way to rip Strickland apart for, in essence, completely and totally trying to b.s. every single Ohioan who initially bought into the report.

Gov. Ted Strickland issued a report this week touting $366 million in reduced state spending last year, but it appears that nearly $210 million did not come from spending cuts.

[...]

The administration said Strickland's "austerity" executive order last year reduced state spending by renegotiating contracts, centralizing more purchases to get lower prices, reducing fuel costs and making a variety of other moves.

Officials said they weren't trying to be misleading by releasing the $366 million figure; they simply compared expenses in three accounting codes from one year to the next for all state agencies, boards and commissions.

Strickland spokeswoman Amanda Wurst said a review by the Office of Budget and Management yesterday found no other anomalies in the report.

In other words, "ok, you caught us."

This is horribly embarrassing for the Strickland Administration. Not to mention, shameful.

Quit while you're behind, Gov.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Governor Envy continues.

This has become a bit of a theme on here, hasn't it?

Well, this time Ohio has a chance to be envious of a guy who has been in office for a grand total of 23 days.
Calling New Jersey's budget a "shambles," Gov. Chris Christie announced Thursday he is immediately freezing all state spending.

Saying New Jersey is on the verge of bankruptcy, Christie declared a fiscal emergency, announcing drastic cuts. Among them, aid to school districts that have excess surpluses.

"Today we are going to act swiftly to fix problems too long ignored. Today I begin to do what I promised the people of New Jersey I would do," Christie said.
Glorious.

In comparison, the most recent biennial budget signed by Ted Strickland increases total spending in Ohio by $4.19 billion, or 7.9%.

Sigh.

Maybe their phones, e-mails, twitter, courier service, and mouths stopped working.

Whoever is in charge at the White House Office of Legislative Affairs needs to consider taking an extended vacation.

This should never, ever, ever, ever, ever happen.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Thursday scrapped a bipartisan jobs bill unveiled hours earlier that had been endorsed by the White House, in a jarring miscommunication between the Obama administration and Democratic congressional leaders.

Reid said Thursday afternoon that he would not introduce a bill made public Thursday morning by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Montana Democrat, and ranking committee member Sen. Charles Grassley, Iowa Republican.

The Democratic leader of the Senate abandoned the bill after hearing complaints from within his own caucus, but only after the White House had already endorsed the Baucus and Grassley bill in the early afternoon.
The lack of communication is downright astonishing.

To the Democratic leadership, thanks for being such complete and inept morons.

About that promise to not raise taxes on the middle class, well....nevermind.

There probably aren't many who voted for McCain that didn't see this coming.

President Barack Obama said he is “agnostic” about raising taxes on households making less than $250,000 as part of a broad effort to rein in the budget deficit.

Obama, in a Feb. 9 Oval Office interview, said that a presidential commission on the budget needs to consider all options for reducing the deficit, including tax increases and cuts in spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

That's right. The President is considering raising taxes on the middle class.

As Jim Geraghty so often states, all of Barack Obama's promises have expiration dates - all of them.

And just so we're clear...



h/t: Campaign Spot

Hope and Change isn't working. Even among Democrats.

It's very simple.

If Democrats truly believed their dear leader was building a greater Republic, they'd be happy with how their liberal dominated capital was running things.

Well, according to a new CBS(!!!) poll, 53% of DEMOCRATS are dissatisfied or angry with how things are going in Washington.

And it doesn't end there. Independents, those Barack Obama can thank for his overwhelming victory, aren't satisfied by a margin of 73-24.

Remember, up until last week, Democrats were in complete and total control of Washington.

Now, with Scott Brown's election, they are just mostly in total and complete control of Washington.

Remember, elections are referendums on the Party in power. Historically speaking, if the people don't believe the job is getting done, which in this case they clearly do not, they give the other guys a shot, even if they may have a lesser opinion of them.

That's frustrating for Democrats to hear, but you can't argue with history.

Another Teddy Tax Hike?

Jesse Hathaway over at Athens Runaway has a fantastic new post on a possible 1$ hike in the sin tax on cigarettes in Ohio.

The money paragraphs:
Other states' attempts to fill budgetary holes by soaking the poor aren't encouraging, either. In New Jersey, the state actually lost $15 million by increasing the sin tax by 12.5 cents. In Maryland, another liberal state that did this, analysts saw a marked increase in black-market cigarette sales, which meant that retailers and small businesses took a big financial hit.

In short, smoking sucks. Don't start it—and if you're already a smoker, stop it. You'll save money in the short-, medium-, and long-run. However, it's not the government's job to tell us what behaviors are good and which are bad.
Check out the rest by clicking here.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Where will Ted Strickland find $117.6 million?

In September, the Columbus Dispatch reported the following:
State officials are banking on federal stimulus money for most or all of the estimated $517.6 million to improve freight rail lines, build or rebuild train stations and buy trains. Officials previously estimated the cost of the medium-speed service at $250 million to $400 million, but those numbers did not account for the cost of the trains.
As we all know by now, Ohio only(!?) received $400 million for the 3-C Slow Speed Choo-Choo.

So, how will we pay for the trains, Governor?

Or were you padding the estimate in order to score more tax dollars from Ohioans?

Either Ohio needs to front the additional cost, or Ted Strickland wanted to abuse our tax dollars.

It's one or the other.

Bill Johnson makes it one for the thumb.

As I hinted yesterday on Twitter, if everything goes as well as hoped, there may be five new Republican Members representing Ohio in the 112th Congress.

Bill Johnson, a retired Lt. Col. in the Air Force and a manufacturing entrepreneur has announced his campaign to challenge Congressman Charlie Wilson (no, not that one) in Ohio's 6th district.

If you only looked at his smackdown of someone named Richard Stobbs in 2008, you'd think Charlie Wilson didn't have much to worry about.

My, how things change.

To start, Stobbs was a filler candidate. In the 2008 environment, there wasn't a serious challenger that wanted to risk losing in the Year of Hope and Change.

But with that being said, it's incredibly important to note that John McCain WON Charlie Wilson's district last year.

And now we're in an environment that convinced the Washington Post/ABC poll analysts to write:
The closeness of the two parties over the past several months on this "generic ballot" measure is similar to that found in most Gallup readings from 1994 through 2005 (spanning the period when Republicans won control of the U.S. House and subsequently maintained it for more than a decade).

Closer to elections, Gallup bases its generic-ballot results on voters deemed most likely to vote. Because Republicans are generally more likely than Democrats to turn out to vote, particularly in midterm elections, their positioning improves by several points when the generic ballot is based on likely voters rather than registered voters. Thus, a tie between Democrats and Republicans among registered voters probably corresponds to a Republican lead among likely voters.
What else helps Johnson's chances? Maybe the fact that Wilson has voted with Pelosi 97% of the time, including the immensely unpopular Obamacare and Stimulus.

Additionally, unemployment within the 6th congressional district tops 12%.

Just under the guise of an exploratory committee, Johnson has already been able to pocket $106k - a fantastic starting point to build from with an obvious propensity for raising much more.

Finally, and to the benefit of all GOP candidates across Ohio, the inspired statewide campaigns of Rob Portman and John Kasich will provide the kind of enthusiasm among Republican voters that simply hasn't been there in years.

It's sounds a little crazy, but come next January the partisan advantage in the Ohio congressional delegation may switch from 10-8 Dems to 13- 5 GOP.

Time to get to work.

If you'd like to help Bill Johnson's campaign, please visit www.billjohnsonleads.com.

UPDATE: Thanks to Jim Geraghty at the National Review, Bill is already getting some national coverage. Check it out.

A tip of that hat to 1,800+ people.

In late January, John Kasich utilized some of the high end technology available to his campaign and took part in an 88 county House Party to discuss his campaign and get his supporters revved up.

Well, doing what every smart candidate does, he's making sure to thank the 1,800+ supporters who participated in the event and hosted their own events across the state.

Seeing as so many of those same supporters regularly visit this site, I wanted to make sure you all got a look. Check it out.