Monday, February 14, 2011

Union Bosses Love Unions

Predictably, government unions are up in arms over Senate Bill 5. In a startling twist, union bosses are arguing that taxing Peter to generously compensate Paul is both fair and economically responsible!
"These lower wages and benefits are going to have an impact on our communities. In order to have a healthy community, you've got to have good jobs." - Bruce Wyngaard, Associate Executive Director, AFSCME Local 11
Public union boss Bruce Wyngaard has a good job - to the tune of $94,337 in 2009. Lots of other American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 11 staffers have good jobs, too: the union paid its employees over $5.8 million in 2009. Taken from 30,870 members, that's the equivalent of nearly $190 per member.


This guy was paid $94,337 in 2009, and wants your taxes increased.

AFSCME Council 8 President John Lyall will testify against Senate Bill 5 on Thursday. Lyall was paid $155,482 in 2009. Think he'll mention that while he's railing about spending cuts? Excluding payments to officers such as Lyall - and $148,265 for First VP Robert Mitchell - AFSCME Council 8 employees were paid more than $5.7 million in 2009. Annual disbursements to union employees equaled more than $155 per member.


Left: $155k in 2009. Right: $148k in 2009. Both: Want your taxes increased.

For context, the unions spent less than half as much on benefits - pensions, medical insurance, etc. - as on union pay in 2009. AFSCME Local 11 spent a little over $2.5 million on benefits; AFSCME Council 8 spent less than $2 million. Is it unreasonable to conclude the primary service provided by government unions is the enrichment of union bosses?

No wonder "leaders" like Bruce Wyngaard and John Lyall insist that without unions, government employees would endure random firings, no benefits, and a steady diet of discount cheese! Anything to keep pressure on the enemy ("the taxpayer") and off the characters earning six figures on member dues.

Leftists have proven time and again that getting rich on the backs of others doesn't preclude you from preaching economic redistribution and decrying personal freedom. AFSCME officials will complain till their complainers are sore about Republican attacks on government employees. Fact is, public union reps are chiefly concerned about public union reps.

Cross-posted at that hero.

1 comment:

  1. Quote: "These lower wages and benefits are going to have an impact on our communities. In order to have a healthy community, you've got to have good jobs." - Bruce Wyngaard, Associate Executive Director, AFSCME Local 11"

    Newsflash Mr. Wyngaard. Before you can have good jobs you have to have jobs period.

    The Ohio public employees and their unions have been pigs at the trough for a long time and all this squealing is normal and it happens in every barnyard when the trough is pulled away.

    The GOP just has to buck up and hang in there. They will win this.

    Just ask the voters whether they want public employee compensation reforms and controls on unions or higher taxes and see what they say!

    ReplyDelete

No profanity, keep it clean.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.