Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Ohio dodged a bullet when Kasich killed the slow-speed train

Bad pun definitely intended.

Time and time again, these feel good rail project end up increasing in cost many times over.  The latest example comes out of California.
Faster than a speeding bullet train, the cost of the state's massive high-speed rail project has zoomed to nearly $100 billion -- triple the estimate given to voters and more than enough to run the entire state government for a year.

What's more, bullet trains won't be up and running until at least 2033, much later than the original estimate of 2020, although that depends on the state finding the remaining 90 percent of the funds needed to complete the plan.

The new business plan pegs the price tag at $98.5 billion, accounting for inflation -- more than double the estimate of $42.6 billion from two years ago, when it was already the priciest public works development in the nation. It's a little less than triple the estimate of $33.6 billion voters were told when they approved the project in 2008. By comparison, the total state budget this year is $86 billion.

Ed at Hot Air explains that a route from LA to San Francisco isn't even needed. Just like there isn't a need for a train from Cleveland to Columbus. Especially one that averages 39 MPH.

1 comment:

  1. And to think, just last week Strickland's old chief of staff was hitting Kasich for his decision to opt out. Laughable.

    Haseley criticized Kasich for returning $400 million to the federal government that Strickland had secured for high-speed rail in Ohio. He said the project would have created 16,000 jobs.



No profanity, keep it clean.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.