Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Unproven Proven Missile Defense

Back during the 2008 campaign we heard Barack Obama speak out of both sides of his mouth on missile defense.

Fine. Whatever. Have it both ways, Mr. President, we're used to that by now.

But let's get one thing straight. Missile defense can no longer be considered "unproven".
Two different Thaad interceptors were launched against a single target, simulating an Army operational concept of dispatching a salvo of weapons to ensure a threat is destroyed. The U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and industry officials declared the flight test a success shortly after it was executed.

However, they disclosed to Aviation Week only recently that the results exceeded their expectations. Early reports from the Pentagon said the second interceptor was intentionally destroyed in flight after the first disabled the target in a hit-to-kill engagement.

“Actually, what happened on the flight test was that the first interceptor hit just as it was supposed to and the second interceptor looked at all of this debris and said, ‘OK, I’ve got another something that looks interesting,’ picked out another threat, and went out and killed it,” says Tom McGrath, Thaad vice president for prime contractor Lockheed Martin. “The second intercept hit another piece of hardware. We can’t talk about what that was, but it picked out what logically you would expect it to pick out and killed it.”
What was that other fragment?

Barack Obama's dignity.

1 comment:

  1. As a blogger who frequently writes on proliferation, arms control, and conservative politics, this post is absolutely true. It is disgraceful what President Obama is doing to missile defense.

    This combined with his arms control policies could truly place America in a tenuous position in the future. This is especially so in an unstable world where things can rapidly change and all contingencies must be thoroughly evaluated.


No profanity, keep it clean.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.